Abdullah Hashem (Aba al-Sadiq) idea of a so-called “Seventh and Final Covenant”

A detailed Shia Islamic refutation of the “Seventh Covenant” claim by Aba al-Sadiq (Abdullah Hashem). Using Qur’an, Ahlul Bayt (ع), and classical Shia scholarship, this article exposes the false Mahdi narrative, altered rituals, and fabricated jurisprudence.

---

Introduction

According to Abdullah Hashem (Aba al-Sadiq) claim, Islam’s traditional laws, rituals, and beliefs are outdated and must be replaced by a new divine system.

From a Shia Islamic perspective, this narrative directly contradicts:

• The Qur’an

• The teachings of the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ

• The guidance of the Ahlul Bayt (ع)

• Classical Shia scholarship

This article provides a clear, academic, and human-readable refutation based on authentic Shia sources.

---

1. Is There a “Final Covenant” After Islam?

Qur’anic Position

“Today I have perfected your religion for you…”

(Qur’an 5:3)

Islam is the final and complete religion. No new covenant can replace it.

Shia Scholarship

Imam Jaʿfar al-Sadiq (ع):

“There is no new religion after Muhammad.”

(Al-Kafi, vol. 1)

Refutation

The Mahdi (عج) revives Islam — he does not create a new religion.

---

2. Can Islamic Law Be Abrogated?

The movement claims Islamic jurisprudence is outdated.

Qur’an

“Whoever seeks a religion other than Islam, it will never be accepted from him.”

(Qur’an 3:85)

Imam Ali (ع)

“The halal of Muhammad is halal until the Day of Judgment.”

(Nahj al-Balagha)

Refutation

Is Abdullah Hashem the Divinely Appointed Leader?

Introduction

Abdullah Hashem (Aba Sadiq), claims to be:

• The divinely appointed representative of Imam Mahdi

• The fulfillment of end-time prophecies

• The bearer of a “seventh covenant”

• The only legitimate authority of God on Earth

He also teaches that:

• Most Sunni and Shia scholars are traitors

• Traditional Islamic law can be abandoned

• Rejecting him equals rejecting Allah

These are extremely serious claims.

In Shia Islam, such matters must be judged only through the Qur’an, the Ahlul Bayt, and authentic scholarship.

This article provides a clear, academic, and respectful Shia refutation of these claims.

---

Does Islam Teach That Only God Appoints Leaders?

Yes. Shia Islam believes that true religious authority comes only from Allah.

“It is not for a believing man or woman to have a choice when Allah and His Messenger have decided a matter.”

(Qur’an 33:36)

However, claiming divine appointment is not the same as proving it.

Imam Jaʿfar al-Sadiq (ع) said:

“Whoever calls people to himself while more knowledgeable people exist is a misguided innovator.”

(Al-Kafi, vol. 1, p. 168)

A real divine representative is recognized through clear, authentic evidence, not self-promotion.

---

Does Rejecting Abdullah Hashem Mean Rejecting Allah?

Abdullah Hashem claims that rejecting him equals rejecting God.

This directly contradicts Shia theology.

Imam Ali (ع) said:

“There is no obedience to a creation if it means disobeying the Creator.”

(Nahj al-Balagha, Sermon 165)

Is Abdullah Hashem Really God’s Chosen Successor?

In a recent sermon, Abdullah Hashem (also known as Aba-Sadiq) presents himself as the divinely appointed successor of Imam Mahdi (عج) and the “Riser of the family of Muhammad.” He claims to be part of a seventh and final covenant from God and says that rejecting him is the same as rejecting Allah Himself.

He also accuses most Muslim scholars of betrayal, says a secret will of the Prophet names him by name, and claims to possess divine knowledge and miracles.

But how do these claims hold up when we examine them through Shīʿī Islamic teachings?

Let’s explore this calmly and thoughtfully.

---

1. Yes, God Appoints Leaders – But Claims Need Proof

Shīʿī Muslims fully agree with one point Abdullah Hashem makes:

Only Allah appoints true leaders.

However, there is a big difference between:

• Being appointed by God

• Claiming to be appointed by God

Islam teaches us that divine leadership must be proven through:

• Clear evidence

• Consistency with the Qurʾān

• The teachings of the Ahl al-Bayt

• Recognized signs

Simply saying “I am chosen by God” does not make it true.

Throughout history, many people have made similar claims. The Imams warned us not to follow anyone who calls people to himself without solid proof.

---

2. Is Rejecting Abdullah Hashem the Same as Rejecting Allah?

Abdullah Hashem says that rejecting him means rejecting God’s rule.

But in Shīʿī Islam, rejecting Allah means rejecting:

• The Qurʾān

• The Prophet Muhammad ﷺ

• The Twelve Imams

• Islamic law (Sharīʿah)

A human being cannot place himself at the same level as divine guidance.

Especially when that person:

• Cancels prayer

• Cancels fasting

• Cancels hijab

• Changes Islamic practices

How can rejecting such changes be the same as rejecting Allah?

---

3. The “Will of the Prophet” and the 12 Mahdis Claim

A major part of Abdullah Hashem’s message is based on a so-called will of the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ that allegedly names:

• 12 Imams

• Followed by 12 Mahdis

• With “Ahmed” and “Abdullah” mentioned

Here’s the problem:

• This will does not exist in reliable Shīʿī sources

• Classical scholars never taught it

• It contradicts the belief in only 12 Imams

• It appeared only in recent times

Shīʿī Islam teaches that any narration must be checked against the Qurʾān and authentic teachings. This “will” fails that test.

Is Abdullah Hashem Really the Representative of Imam Mahdi?

 A Shīʿī Perspective on the “Ahmadi Religion of Peace and Light”

In recent years, a group known as the Ahmadi Religion of Peace and Light has gained attention online. Its leader, Abdullah Hashem (also called Aba-Sadiq), claims to be the only representative of Imam Mahdi (عج) and says that obeying him is the same as obeying the Prophet Muhammad, Jesus, and Moses.

He also claims that anyone who does not pledge allegiance to him is misguided—even respected Sunni and Shīʿī scholars.

But how do these claims stand when we look at Shīʿī Islamic teachings?

Let’s examine this calmly and clearly.

---

1. Yes, Leadership in Islam Is Divinely Appointed – But Claims Need Proof

Shīʿī Muslims believe that true leaders are chosen by Allah, not by themselves.

However, claiming divine appointment is not the same as proving it.

Throughout Islamic history, many people have claimed special status. The Imams taught us not to follow such claims blindly. Any real representative of Imam Mahdi must:

• Follow the Qurʾān

• Follow the teachings of the Ahl al-Bayt

• Respect Islamic law (Sharīʿah)

• Be supported by authentic evidence

Simply saying “I am appointed by God” is not enough.

---

2. Are Scholars Really the Enemy of Islam?

Abdullah Hashem says that most Sunni and Shīʿī scholars are dangerous and worse than Yazid’s army because they do not support him.

But Shīʿī Islam teaches the opposite.

During the occultation of Imam Mahdi, scholars are meant to guide the community using:

• Qurʾān

• Hadith

• Teachings of the Imams

They are not perfect, but they are not enemies of Islam either.

Calling all scholars corrupt is a classic cult tactic to isolate followers.

---

3. The “Will of the Prophet” and the Name “Ahmed”

One of the main proofs used by this movement is a so-called “will” of the Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ), which supposedly mentions a future leader named “Ahmed.”

Here’s the problem:

• This “will” does not exist in reliable Shīʿī sources

• Classical scholars never taught it

• It contradicts the belief in only 12 Imams

• It appeared very recently

Is Praying , Fasting and Wearing Hijab Necessary ?

Below is a Shīʿī doctrinal refutation of the claims made in the Yamani/Ahmadi Religion of Peace and Light video, using Qurʾān, Ahl al-Bayt (ع) narrations, and established Imāmī theology.

---

Refutation of the “Seventh Covenant” & Abandonment of Islamic Law

A Shīʿī Response to the Yamani / Ahmadi Religion of Peace and Light

---

1. The Finality of Islam & No New Sharīʿah After the Prophet ﷺ

The video claims that a “seventh covenant” has appeared with new laws, worship, and a new book, allegedly brought by “Qāʾim ʿAbdullāh Hāshim”.

This directly contradicts Qurʾān and Shīʿī creed.

Qurʾān: Finality of Prophethood

مَا كَانَ مُحَمَّدٌ أَبَا أَحَدٍ مِّن رِّجَالِكُمْ وَلَـٰكِن رَّسُولَ اللَّهِ وَخَاتَمَ النَّبِيِّينَ
“Muhammad is not the father of any of your men, but the Messenger of Allah and the Seal of the Prophets.”
(Qurʾān 33:40)

No new covenant, prophet, or divine law can come after him.

Shīʿī Hadith

Imām al-Ṣādiq (ع) said:

حَلَالُ مُحَمَّدٍ حَلَالٌ إِلَى يَوْمِ الْقِيَامَةِ، وَحَرَامُهُ حَرَامٌ إِلَى يَوْمِ الْقِيَامَةِ
“The lawful of Muhammad is lawful until the Day of Judgment, and his unlawful is unlawful until the Day of Judgment.”
(Al-Kāfī, vol. 1, p. 58)

The Mahdī (عج) does not bring new laws. He revives the Qurʾān and the Sunnah.

---

2. The Mahdī (عج) Does NOT Abolish Prayer, Fasting, or Hijab

The video claims that when the “Messiah” is present, he becomes the prayer and fasting, so rituals are no longer needed.

This is Christian theology, not Islam.

Qurʾān: Worship Is Permanent

وَاعْبُدْ رَبَّكَ حَتَّىٰ يَأْتِيَكَ الْيَقِينُ
“Worship your Lord until death comes to you.”
(Qurʾān 15:99)

No human being replaces worship.

Examining the ‘Divine Mysteries' Lecture of Abdullah Hashem Aba al-Sadiq

 Below is a Twelver (Isnā ‘Asharī) Shia refutation of the lecture of Aba Sadiq Yamani in which he discussed Divine Mysteries.

1. The “Egg” Analogy & Claim of Hidden Religion

Claims of Abdullah Hashem Aba al-Sadiq 

Most people only take the “crust” of religion; the real religion is hidden and mysterious.

Shia Response:

Islam is not an esoteric cult where only a secret elite has access to truth. The Qur’an repeatedly affirms that guidance is clear, not hidden.

Qur’an:

“This is a clear statement for mankind, and a guidance and an admonition for the God-conscious.”
(Qur’an 3:138)

Imam Ja‘far al-Ṣādiq (ع):

“Allah has not left anything that the servants need except that He has clarified it for them.”
(al-Kāfī, vol. 1, p. 59)

Conclusion:
Islam is not a “mystery egg.” Its core beliefs, laws, and guidance are clear and accessible.

---

2. Misuse of Qur’an 6:116 (Majority Misguided)

Refutation of “The Yamani / Mahdi Parallel to Jesus” Narrative

 Below is a Shia Ithnā ‘Asharī (Twelver) refutation of the claims of Aba Al Sadeq Al-Yamani, using Qur’an, authentic Shia hadith, and classical theology.

Each major claim is addressed one by one

---

1. Claim: The 12 Imams are “disciples” of Prophet Muhammad like the apostles of Jesus

Refutation

In Shia Islam, the Imams are not disciples, nor are they “messengers from Muhammad.”

They are divinely appointed successors (A’immah), not apostles or emissaries.

Qur’anic Principle

إِنَّمَا وَلِيُّكُمُ اللَّهُ وَرَسُولُهُ وَالَّذِينَ آمَنُوا

“Your only guardian is Allah, His Messenger, and the believers…”

(Qur’an 5:55)

The Imams are Awliyā’ (divine authorities), not “disciples.”

Hadith (Ghadir)

مَنْ كُنْتُ مَوْلَاهُ فَهٰذَا عَلِيٌّ مَوْلَاهُ

“Whoever I am the master of, Ali is his master.”

(Sahih Shia & Sunni sources)

This establishes succession, not discipleship.

Shia Creed

Imams are:

• Divinely appointed

• Infallible

• Hujjah (Proof of Allah)

• Not missionaries of Muhammad

The “apostle” model is Christian theology, not Shia Islam.

---

2. Claim: Imams are “messengers from Muhammad”

Qur’anic Refutation

مَّا كَانَ مُحَمَّدٌ أَبَا أَحَدٍ مِن رِّجَالِكُمْ وَلَـٰكِن رَّسُولَ اللَّهِ وَخَاتَمَ النَّبِيِّينَ

“Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah and the Seal of the Prophets.”

(Qur’an 33:40)

There is no messenger after him—not even “from him.”

Shia Doctrine

Imams:

• Do not receive revelation (wahy)

• Do not bring new law

• Are guardians of the Sharia

Calling them “messengers” is bid‘ah (innovation).

---

3. Claim: Prophet Muhammad and Jesus “united with God”

This is Christian theology, not Islam.

Qur’an Rejects Divine Union

لَيْسَ كَمِثْلِهِ شَيْءٌ

“There is nothing like Him.”

(Qur’an 42:11)

قُلْ هُوَ اللَّهُ أَحَدٌ

“Say: He is Allah, One.”

(Qur’an 112:1)

No human “unites” with Allah.

Imams Explicitly Rejected This

Imam Ali (ع):

هَلَكَ فِيَّ رَجُلَانِ: مُحِبٌّ غَالٍ وَمُبْغِضٌ قَالٍ

“Two groups are destroyed concerning me: the exaggerator and the hater.”

(Nahj al-Balagha)

Anyone who says the Imams “became godlike” is a ghālī (extremist).